Blog

Trackside Axle-Counter Sensor PCBA Case Study

0
Trackside Axle Counter Sensor PCBA Case Study

In a railway signalling system, an axle counter uses trackside sensors to detect passing wheels and help determine whether a section of track is occupied or clear. The PCBA in this project sits at the front end of that process, where reliable wheel detection and signal processing are essential.

PCBCool recently worked on a trackside wheel-detection sensor PCBA for this type of axle-counting system. We selected the project as a representative case study to show how it progressed from prototype development to the subsequent production program.

Note: This case study is published with the customer’s permission and was reviewed by the customer before publication.

Project Background

The customer is an independent European subsidiary of a global rail technology group founded in 1938, with more than 50,000 employees worldwide. The group supplies railway infrastructure and signalling equipment, including axle-counting systems, track circuits, railway signals, and point-control systems, to major rail operators across Europe.

For this project, the customer selected PCBCool’s turnkey service. The cooperation began with 20 assembled prototypes and later expanded into a rolling program of 800 PCBAs, covering eight related board variants used within the same signalling system.

Original project Gerber stack up preview image

PCB Specifications

ParameterSpecification
PCB Design6-layer PCB designed in Cadence Allegro 25.1
Board FormatLong, narrow trackside sensor board with terminal pads at both ends
Base MaterialHigh-Tg FR-4, Tg ≥170°C
Finished Thickness1.6 mm typical
Copper Weight1 oz outer layers; 0.5–1 oz inner layers
Surface FinishENIG
Minimum Trace / Space5 mil / 5 mil (0.127 mm)
Minimum Drill Size0.2 mm
Drill Tolerance±0.05 mm
Special ProcessesVia-in-pad and impedance control

Railway Design References

StandardApplication
EN 50125Environmental conditions for railway equipment
EN 50121Railway electromagnetic compatibility requirements
EN 50155Electronic equipment requirements used as a project design reference

Main BOM Components

FunctionComponent
MCUST STM32U073RCI6
Buck ConverterTI TPS62840DLC
Magnetic SensorTI TMAG5173A2-Q1 3D Hall-effect sensor
Temperature and Humidity SensorTI HDC3022QDEFRQ1
Level TranslatorTI TXU0104RUTR 4-bit level translator
Circuit ProtectionLittelfuse SC3051-04HTG TVS array
ClockAbracon 32.768 kHz crystal
CapacitorsMurata 4.7 µF, 10 µF, and 100 nF capacitors
Inductor2.2 µH inductor
ResistorsVishay resistors
BOM Size16 line items

Assembly Requirements

Parameter Requirement
Component Sourcing 100% turnkey component sourcing
Assembly Process SMT assembly, including BGA, QFN, and other leadless packages
Protective Coating Conformal coating for trackside environmental protection
Connector Assembly Selective wave soldering for through-hole connectors
Inspection AOI and X-ray inspection
Testing Electrical testing before shipment

Project Challenges

The difficulty of this project did not come from one technical specification alone, but from several constraints occurring at the same time.

The board used a 6-layer construction with via-in-pad structures and 5 mil trace and space. Together, these features required a level of process control approaching HDI production and increased the manufacturing risk. Because some vias were located directly within component pads, any solder loss into the via or unevenness on the pad surface could affect component seating and solder-joint consistency. With an initial order of only 20 boards, there was also little yield buffer.

The 16-line BOM added a separate sourcing challenge. It included automotive-qualified sensors and several components with limited or uncertain availability. Every part had to match the approved specification, remain traceable, and arrive in time for assembly. Component procurement was therefore not a separate administrative task; it became part of the production schedule itself.

The prototypes also had to arrive within the customer’s fixed commissioning window. Short-notice, low-volume projects often face longer lead times and small-batch premiums, especially when PCB fabrication and assembly are handled by different suppliers.

This was the model the customer was really testing: 

Whether one partner could manage high-reliability manufacturing, low-volume production, and fast turnaround without dividing PCB fabrication and assembly between separate vendors.

Engineering Solution

After reviewing these challenges, our engineering team adopted the following measures:

  • For Via-in-Pad

The vias located within component pads were filled, planarized, and plated over. Filling closed the path that could otherwise draw solder into the hole during reflow soldering, while planarization and plating restored a flat surface for component soldering.

  • For Fine-Line

Direct imaging was used for the 5 mil trace-and-space pattern instead of conventional film exposure, reducing registration variation caused by phototool movement or dimensional change. Vacuum-assisted etching improved the circulation of etchant across the panel and reduced solution pooling, helping maintain the intended conductor width and spacing.

  • For Component Sourcing

All 16 BOM line items were sourced through authorized, traceable channels and checked against the approved manufacturer part numbers and package specifications. Procurement started alongside PCB fabrication so that component availability would not hold back the assembly schedule.

  • For PCBA assembly

The board combined fine-pitch leadless devices in the central sensor area with large terminal pads at both ends. Placement and reflow settings were therefore planned to accommodate both component types within the same production flow. Once assembly was complete, the boards moved directly into inspection and testing without being transferred to a separate supplier.

Efforts in Quality Assurance

Quality checks were carried out at each stage of the project rather than only after assembly:

GateFocusKey Checks
IQCMaterials and components
  • Laminate verification;
  • Authorized-channel components with lot traceability;
  • Automotive-qualified ICs verified against manufacturer lot data.
IPQCFabrication and assembly
  • Via-in-pad fill quality;
  • DI registration for 5 mil features;
  • Reflow profile verification.
OQCFinished PCBA
  • Electrical testing;
  • AOI inspection;
  • X-ray inspection.

For this project, X-ray inspection was mandatory because the solder joints of the leadless components were hidden beneath the package.

Final Thoughts

The 20-piece prototype did more than prove that the board could be built. It showed that PCBCool could manage the project reliably enough to earn the customer’s continued trust and follow-on work.

If you are looking for a true manufacturing partner—not just a supplier for a single order—consider PCBCool for support from prototype development through repeat production.

FAQs

Q1: Does Via-in-Pad Always Require Filling?

A: Not always. Vias located within active solder pads are typically filled, while thermal vias may use other treatments depending on the assembly design.

Q2: What Are the Main Risks of Via-in-Pad Under Leadless Components?

A: The main risks include solder wicking, surface dimpling, incomplete filling, and poor pad flatness.

Q3: Is a 0.2 mm Drilled Via Automatically Considered a Microvia?

A: No. A 0.2 mm via is often mechanically drilled. Under IPC guidance, microvias used in HDI structures are generally limited to 150 µm or less in diameter.

Q4: What Process Controls Are Critical for 5 Mil Trace and Space?

A: Image registration, copper thickness, etching uniformity, and final conductor dimensions require tighter control because small variations can consume much of the available process margin.

Q5: Why Is Direct Imaging Used for Fine-Line PCB Patterns?

A: Direct imaging reduces registration variation associated with physical phototools and provides better control of fine features across the production panel.

Q6: What Does Vacuum-Assisted Etching Improve?

A: It improves etchant exchange across the panel, reduces solution pooling and uneven side etching, and helps maintain more consistent trace widths and spacing.

Q7: What Should Be Reviewed During DFM for This Type of Sensor Board?

A: The review should cover via-in-pad treatment, annular-ring and drill tolerances, copper-to-edge clearance, fine-line capability, pad geometry, solder-mask openings, stackup, and test access.

Andy
Andy | PCB Manufacturing and Assembly Specialist

Andy is an experienced PCB industry professional with decades of experience in PCB manufacturing, assembly, and customer support. At PCBCool, he leads the marketing team and helps turn practical project experience into useful technical content for engineers, buyers, and product developers.

Related Tags